Avatar

Did you actually try Grokipedia?

by Cornpop Sutton ⌂, A bad bad dude who makes good shine., Wednesday, October 01, 2025, 01:33 (8 days ago) @ JoFrance

It just leads back to X posts.

Wikipedia is the usual Lord of the Flies "I am a moderator so I rule you peons durr hurr hurr" faggot assed bullshit. Wikipedia has a hierarchy of moderators that are mostly leftist (faggots!) who enforce lies and the social wrong at all times. (For example there was a fight on Wikipedia over allowing the story of the Ukrainian girl stabbed by the black monster on a Charlotte NC light rail to be made an article. The thrust was to suppress it because of course blacks are ascended blameless beings and the white bitch deserved it.)

Sorry.

There's value in Wikipedia but only in hard factual areas. Anything with partisan influence, it's usually lies. Once in a while they display a donation window. I wipe my @$$ on it and dismiss it.

Did you actually try Grokipedia?

by JoFrance, Wednesday, October 01, 2025, 20:00 (7 days ago) @ Cornpop Sutton

I've never used Grokipedia, just Grok. It must be just for searching tweets right now. Elon Musk said he would build Grokipedia to allow facts from all of the banned right-leaning sites to be used as sources. Currently, Wikipedia uses only left wing sources like NY Times, WashPo, Cnn, etc. Right wing sites like Fox News, NY Post and Breitbart are blacklisted. It'll be interesting to see what he does.

Wikipedia is good for more factual searches. Its not going to go away, but now it'll have competition. That's a good thing. I read about them fighting over allowing the awful story about the murder of Iryna Zarutska, the Ukrainian girl. That's terrible.

RSS Feed of thread