Quiet before the storm: Dems Plan 14 Amendment Coup on Inauguration

https://twitter.com/matttttt187/status/1855033392762372187

This is reliable. (School the fuck up on the name "Jamie Raskin" if you don't know who that is.) Jimmy Dore has a straight information approach, he doesn't invent conspiracies.

Raskin has stated publicly that dems will use the 14th amendment (president may not be installed if has committed an "insurrection") to block Trump from taking power. He has talked about defending his party from the "rampaging Trump mobs" and having to use bodyguards if you're a politician.

The deep state and the top level dems are definitely staying quiet so as to not tip their hands. They don't have that much restraint when things are actually normal. Remember Hillary bloviating in 2016 about her loss? None of that except in niche news coverage.

I suspect if the scope is as large as this story implies that - while this action won't be legal, the portion of the joint chiefs that support the concept will sign on to use the military to enforce what amounts to a coup.

I believe based on this understanding that come January 20th if this has backing, we're going to see utter meltdown.

The reason we wouldn't is that Raskin is a fringe lunatic with a big mouth and he has no backing. He may be a lunatic but we have no real idea how pervasive the scheme is.

If the coup has no backing they will look like the assholes they are and melt away. If the coup has solid backing, have your preps in order.

It isn't going to happen. Enough of the rank and file military would side with Trump, making this a go-nowhere proposition. Congress needs to pass a resolution to disqualify someone via the 14th Amendment, and Republicans in Congress aren't going to vote for that.

Pretty much my thoughts when considering it.

Such a difference between libs and conservatives. In 2020 we weakly protested that there ought to be recalls. In 2024 you have faggot redditors screaming about overthrowing Trump.

Trump was never charged with insurrection and neither were any of the J6er's. It wasn't an insurrection. Raskin has been talking about doing that for awhile but its going nowhere. It didn't work when states used the same argument to try to keep Trump off the ballot because there was no insurrection.

The people of this country delivered a resounding message to Democrats on Nov. 5 that even they can understand. They lost and their lawfare games sure won't work now that Trump won the election.

They're already going to plan B, which is to sabotage his administration, but it will be hard to do this time. Trump knows them all too well and so do the rest of us.

All jawboning to appease misled/disappointed voters.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

For this to happen at all, firstly a complainant would need to apply to the US Supreme Court for a certificate (declaring that the president-elect was in fact disqualified from being inaugurated as president).

Secondly, the applicant would need to persuade the court that the applicant had standing,

Thirdly, the applicant would need to persuade the court that the office of president was included in the phrase "any office" despite the explicit namings of Senator, Representative and elector (IOW any office means any other office below those named).

Fourthly, the applicant would need to persuade the court that either an insurrection or a rebellion had occurred, and that Trump had "engaged" in that insurrection or rebellion.

Despite all the frothing from ideological opponents, Trump told people to be peaceful.

Alternatively, fourthly, the applicant would need to persuade the court that a named party was an enemy of the US, and that aid or comfort was given to that party, and that Trump was a giver of that aid or comfort.

A majority of the court is not going to be persuaded of all of the things.

There's some real normalcy bias on this board and in this thread. July 13 was incomprehensible to everyone, including me, until it happened. I put nothing past these demons.

And you have to consider the desperation level of the establishment players in all this. The Epstein files, and perhaps the P. Diddy files, may be released on Trump's watch. There are a lot of anxious high level pervs in this country and around the world actually.

A "solution" for the existential "problem" that Democrats face now would be extra-legal. An actual coup.

I actually believe that the Democrats and the deep state security apparatus (FBI/NSA/CIA/homeland+many "plants" within the military at all levels) are coordinated well enough to force things.

I personally believe a coup would fail, but the richest people in the world are being hazarded by revelations of their screwing some underage girl on Epstein Island 15 years ago. Unless they can stop Orange Man from ruining their lives.

Or y'all's normalcy bias may be the correct take. To me on July 13 the world entered an alternate dimension wormhole.

Democrats will try anything but a coup would be tough to pull off. I think Democrats played all their cards and lost. The richest people that did heinous things are now beholden to Trump's mercy to not expose them. It won't be pretty if they're exposed but maybe it has to be so people can understand how sick and evil these people really are.

Plan B is their only choice now. Sabotage. Its all they have left to stop Trump but it won't work. I think they know they can't defeat him at this point so most are now more focused on saving their own ass.

Lump almost all Democrats and RINO/Never Trumper Republicans as two flavors of the uniparty. They're both hard to tell apart these days.

Regardless, I say that it's easily conceivable that "the Deep State" (which is whatever is above both parties in authority - probably something like WEF, Bilderberg, or a consortium of several named entities, etc) is directing things through its objectives.

The Democrats may want to block Trump through force but they may simply be aligned with whomever initially requested that Trump be killed... the level that I would expect to see force majeur originate from.

Your arguments seem like something that would have been said on this forum pre-July about a Trump assassination attempt. "Oh, they're not that brazen." Not the Democrats, but their puppet masters.

I said something alluding to assassination of Trump in May and I didn't tie it specifically to Democrats who again are Uniparty:

https://deplorablecoder.club/index.php?id=33029

Oh yeah, you'd see insurrection for real and blood in the streets and political assassinations and the like if the CIA killed Trump. People fighting and being pissed isn't a movement. It's a reason to lock down the country with permanent martial law.

I say expect ANYTHING in January. A sudden war. A power grid failure. A nuke. Or just some well organized mainstream news effort to tell us that powers that be who only want the best for the US are banding together to thwart the inauguration.

The uniparty really sucks because they're controlled by the deep state bureaucrats and the globalists, like WEF. I know they're capable of anything because they know he's going to kill their agenda. I wouldn't put anything past them, but a coup would be hard for them to pull off. I hope it doesn't come to that, but they know their world is over if he's inaugurated, so they're desperate.

RSS Feed of thread

P.A.G.A.N. - People Against Goodness And Normalcy

Quiet before the storm: Dems Plan 14 Amendment Coup on Inauguration (Public Board)

Quiet before the storm: Dems Plan 14 Amendment Coup on Inauguration

Quiet before the storm: Dems Plan 14 Amendment Coup on Inauguration

Won't happen because it won't succeed

But remember - they tried to kill Trump 3x and almost succeeded

But remember - they tried to kill Trump 3x and almost succeeded

Forget "Democrats" for a moment - I mean the actual puppet masters

Forget "Democrats" for a moment - I mean the actual puppet masters