In the huge metropolitan regions (NYC, Chicago, LA, SF, others), excessive growth is defined as a threat and is choked off when it encroaches on quality of life.
The difference between your area and mine is that in Ohio there is no perception that rampant growth is anything but positive. You see local idiots on Facebook groups lauding the fact that Cincinnati and Dayton have grown together into a low density urban region.
Our part of the country is freeer than yours. Therefore you have lower growth and guardrails against growth in some areas in NJ and the hicks here are allowed to build anyplace as fast as possible.
The *only* way in Ohio to live in a stable, historic town like yours is to be 100 miles+ outside the commutable distance from any large city.
The NIMBYism is precisely why Californian real estate inflated so fast. You can't build in certain natural areas, on some hills and mountains, etc.
My town even has a stupid goddamned fucking moronic solar farm which they built over the last year. It's in a floodplain but still it's ugly as shit and will do little to offset energy costs and demand.
The locals eat that crap up because it's "progress" - fuck us as badly as a big city and we love it. If this local area could become as dense and developed as Long Island the locals would have a collective orgasm of bliss. Congestion and traffic would be hailed as benefits... kind of like right now.
NIMBYism is criticized as hypocritical for depriving the public of opportunities for economic expansion but it's really certain elites and entrenched locals committed to conserving local flavor.